Miami Dolphins star receiver, Tyreek Hill.

Miami Dolphins star receiver, Tyreek Hill.LAPRESSE

In a recent development, Tyreek Hill, the NFL star, has come forward to deny the allegations made by plus-size influencer Sophie Hall, who claims he broke her leg during a backyard football lesson. According to DailyMail.com, Hill insists that he did not touch Hall, and her injuries were a result of her own “careless and negligent manner” during the playful practice drills at his home in Southwest Ranches, Florida.

Sophie Hall, 35, has filed a lawsuit against Tyreek Hill, alleging that he charged at her with such force that it resulted in a fractured right leg and the need for reconstructive surgery.

However, Hill’s legal team argues that Hall’s injuries were pre-existing and that she was aware that the sports activity involved contact. They are seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that it fails to make a viable legal case for punitive damages.

The court filing from Hill’s lawyers states, “Plaintiff consented to participating in a sports activity that involved contact and thus there was a good faith basis to believe that the plaintiff was aware of contact would be involved, despite in this case, plaintiff was not touched by [Hill] as she tripped over a dog.” This indicates that Hill’s defense is centered around the claim that Hall’s injuries were not caused by his actions but rather by her own actions during the drills.

Hill denies injury allegations from OnlyFans model

The legal battle between Hill and Hall has garnered attention, especially with the mention of OnlyFans model Sophie Hall. The lawsuit and the subsequent response from Hill’s legal team have sparked public interest and debate.

In response to the allegations made against him, Hill’s lawyers have taken a firm stance, asserting that Hall’s injuries were not caused by any direct action from Hill. They are pushing for the dismissal of the lawsuit based on the argument that Hall’s injuries were pre-existing and that she was aware of the risks involved in the sports activity.

The developments in this case shed light on the complexities of legal disputes involving sports activities and personal injury claims. It also brings attention to the challenges of determining liability in such situations. As the legal proceedings unfold, the public will be keen to see how this case progresses and how the courts will ultimately rule on the matter.