New York Liberty v Indiana Fever, Caitlin Clark, Breanna Stewart, Sabrina Ionesco

There’s no question Caitlin Clark’s ascent has sparked a fever of debates and discussions within the sports community. These conversations span a variety of compelling topics, from the groundbreaking implications of her $28 million Nike shoe deal to profound explorations of gender and race dynamics in sports culture.

Recently, much of the discourse has centered on the controversy surrounding Clark’s omission from the Paris Olympics U.S. roster, igniting intense debate and prompting deep reflections on equity and the criteria for elite sports selection. Last week on ESPN’s First Take, Stephen A. Smith criticized Team USA’s decision not to include Clark. He expressed clear frustration stating, “It was a stupid decision because it compromises the ultimate goal, which is to elevate the WNBA brand. How could you be that idiotic and not make that call?” Smith’s strong comments reflect a broader sentiment that Clark’s presence on the Olympic team would not only enhance the team’s chances of success but also serve to elevate the profile of women’s basketball, drawing more attention and support to the WNBA.

Stephen A. Smith’s comments, while passionate about promoting the WNBA through players like Caitlin Clark, can have negative implications for the league in several ways. Firstly, by focusing heavily on Clark and her exclusion from the Olympic roster, the media narrative shifts away from discussing the broader achievements and strengths of the entire Team USA roster, which undermines the WNBA’s efforts to be recognized for its depth of talent across all teams and players, not just the few high-profile names. Secondly, Smith’s criticism implies that the WNBA’s success hinges significantly on the recognition and participation of a few star players. This narrative diminishes the value of team cohesion and collective effort, which are essential for sustained success in sports. It also reinforces a stereotype that women’s sports need singular personalities to be marketable or relevant, rather than celebrating the league’s overall competitiveness and the diversity of talent it offers.

Similiarly, Chicago Sky Guard Chennedy Carter’s hard foul on Caitlin Clark during the June 16 matchup garnered widespread attention, sparking a flurry of commentary across the sports media landscape. ESPN’s First Take, Shannon Sharpe, was quick to condemn the play, calling it a “cheap shot.” Stephen A. Smith added his perspective, emphasizing that while incidents like these may not typically draw extensive media coverage, the involvement of Caitlin Clark changes the narrative. He stated, “In the grand scheme of things, it’s not a big story, but it’s a big story because it involves Caitlin Clark.” ESPN’s Doris Burke drew parallels to a similar incident during the NBA Championship Game involving Dallas Mavericks Center Kristaps Porzingis and Boston Celtics Power Forward P.J. Washington, further highlighting the ongoing scrutiny of the challenges faced by Clark this season. Burke commented, “If Caitlin Clark were in that situation, it could fuel debate for a week,” emphasizing how Clark’s prominence accentuates the significance of incidents that often escape notice.

Amidst these discussions and debates, the WNBA finds itself at a pivotal juncture, grappling with the broader implications of Clark’s impact on the league’s dynamics and public perception. While her presence indisputably increases viewership and engagement overall, it often eclipses discussions about the actual games and top teams. Supporters could argue that the attention on Clark benefits the league by boosting visibility, citing statistics that four out of the five most notable viewership highlights in May revolved around Clark and the Indiana Fever. However, there is a contrasting viewpoint to consider: intense focus on Clark might overshadow other talented players and teams, potentially limiting their recognition and appreciation. This disparity in media coverage could influence the league’s overarching narrative and potentially impede its growth and development.

By signing up, you agree to receive this newsletter, other updates about Forbes and its affiliates’ offerings, our Terms of Service (including resolving disputes on an individual basis via arbitration), and you acknowledge our Privacy Statement. Forbes is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Connecticut Sun and New York Liberty Lead WNBA: Top Teams Seek Spotlight Amid Caitlin Clark Controversies

Connecticut Sun v Indiana Fever, Caitlin Clark, Dijonai Carrington

Consider the league’s current top teams: the Connecticut Sun and the New York Liberty. Under the leadership of Forward Alyssa Thomas, the Connecticut Sun have established themselves as frontrunners in the league, boasting an impressive record of 13 wins and 1 loss; their sole defeat came against the league’s second-most dominant team, the 12-3 New York Liberty. Despite the Sun’s outstanding performance thus far, recent headlines have primarily focused on Guard DiJonai Carrington’s defensive matchups against Clark during games. Furthermore, considerable attention has been drawn to Caitlin Clark’s initial response to the misuse of her name in endorsing agendas tainted by racism and bigotry, prompting a strong rebuttal from Carrington on her platform at X. It must be acknowledged that, given the Sun’s forward momentum and dominance in the league, their journey undoubtedly deserves more attention than it has received.

The New York Liberty made headlines in May with their 90-81 victory over Caitlin Clark’s Indiana Fever, setting a record by generating $2 million in ticket revenue at the Barclays Center. Reflecting on the game, the Liberty’s Power Forward Breanna Stewart remarked, “I think the buzz and attention that Caitlin has brought from Iowa to the WNBA is going to be a collective win for all. When I first started in the league, some teams weren’t even making revenue… It’s a long time coming. We’re happy to be at this point, but we’re not satisfied.”

Stewart’s point is well noted; there remains more to be achieved, both for the Liberty and the league as a whole. The New York Liberty have cemented their status as one of the WNBA’s most formidable and enthralling teams. Spearheaded by the dynamic duo of Breanna Stewart and Guard Sabrina Ionescu, they collectively contribute an impressive 36.9 points per game. Ionescu, in particular, has been stellar, ranking among the league’s top 5 for assists with an average of 6.1 per game and totaling 38 successful three-pointers to-date. Their seamless teamwork and exceptional skills make them essential viewing, captivating fans and setting a high standard for performance and synergy in the league—a narrative that undoubtedly warrants more media attention, independent of Clark’s influence.

WNBA’s Future Focus: Emphasizing Excellence Beyond Caitlin Clark

New York Liberty v Phoenix Mercury, Brittney Griner, Breanna Stewart

Amid Caitlin Clark’s undeniable impact in reigniting passion for women’s basketball across a broader WNBA audience, the 2024 season prompts a pivotal question: will this momentum lead to a stronger emphasis on showcasing the league’s overall competitive landscape and the standout performances of other players and teams, or will the continued intense media attention on Clark ultimately pull the league in the opposite direction? Proponents argue that shifting dialogue isn’t just beneficial but crucial for ensuring the WNBA’s sustained success.

While the WNBA seems poised for a future where top teams and standout players garner significant attention, the question remains whether the spotlight on Clark will extend to the entire league or potentially hinder its progress. The journey toward solidifying the WNBA’s position and expanding its appeal beyond individual stars represents a critical challenge for the future progress of the league.